We stay in a condo in JB (Malaysia) that is roughly 20 y.o., and it was time to renovate the kitchen and bring the kitchen up to modern standards. We asked some price quotations from several contractors, included the special service from HomePro (www.homepro.com.my/home-projects). Although HomePro was offering the most expensive total price, we decided to contract this firm, mostly because we knew the firm from Thailand, and we had very good experiences with the Thai HomePro. Little did we know that the Malaysian franchise wasn’t as reliable as the Thai parent.
Anyway, HomePro Malaysia promised us to do everything at a given price: interior design, hacking, cementing, tiling, electricity, installing, painting, just name it, the renovation of the kitchen and adjacent storage and bathroom would be in one hand (HomePro), and we didn’t have to contact several workers, we only had to work with our one contact person at HomePro Malaysia. Price: 54.000,00 MR for work and 5.000,00 MR for materials. Payment must be upfront, otherwise they won’t work (no trust in customer, obviously). A time-frame was given, in which the works would be done: roughly 2 months.
Since we trusted HomePro, we didn’t ask for too many warranties, just a basic 2 pages description of how the renovation would be done, and some prints of the future look of the kitchen were handed over to us. Now we deeply regret that we didn’t insisted on a detailed description and on a clear sanction or compensation if HomePro would not deliver according to their promises.
The works didn’t take roughly 2 months, they took more then 4 months, with workers not showing up from time to time, or arriving late in the morning and leaving early in the afternoon. Living 2 months in a condo without a kitchen is already a very unpleasant challenge, but if it takes more then 4 months it becomes a horror story.
We asked for compensation from HomePro for this horrible delay in work and lack of comfort for us, but HomePro refused to give any financial compensation.
The works were badly organized. For example: when the goods (tiles, toilet, ….) were delivered by a HomePro truck, the HomePro workers in the truck refused to bring the goods in the condo, they claimed that they only had to put the goods on the floor, 1.5 m. from the truck. They didn’t care what would happen with the goods after that. The contractor who was working at that time (drilling the old tiles) wasn’t aware of the delivery and didn’t instruct the one person working to bring the goods up. It was only after several contacts with the HomePro contact-person, that the workers were found willing to store the goods in the condo. A horrible experience.
Some works were simply lousy and extremely bad done. For example the plumbers: they installed new piping in daytime, with huge water leaking at night, repaired the day after, leaking again the night after, and so on and so forth. Nobody cleaned up the rubbish, caused by the massive water leaking, we had to do it ourselves. HomePro once again showed a total lack of respect for the client and an incredible amateurism in choosing the contractors and workers, with a total lack of follow-up.
Although it was clearly understood that the 2 pages of listing of work and materials would cover the totality of the renovation, HomePro requested extra money for some parts, for instance the price of the toilet: since we paid for toilet + installation, we supposed that the price included all materials for installation, such as a tap to connect the toilet to the water-supply. No no, for that tap we had to pay extra, HomePro was not willing to provide it included in the paid price. Same thing happened with numerous other small parts. This was a horrible lesson for us: if we every contract with HomePro in the future, every screw and every nail will be detailed in the price agreement, so that there is no discussion at all, and so that HomePro cannot profit twice. Our confidence in that firm is down to zero.
This list is to be continued. We are now in the process of finalizing the works and that by itself is already a drama. We’ll keep this page open for further comment. Just some pictures of painting works, that HomePro claimed was duly finished; it is clear that the painting was not fully done yet, contrary to the false claims of HomePro.
The horror story continues .
Sunday, December 22, 2019
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Belgians are building giga hotel with 100 swimming pools and 700 rooms in Dubai
The Belgian company Besix is fully engaged in the construction of the Royal Atlantis Hotel. That should soon include more than one hundred swimming pools, more than two hundred apartments and another seven hundred rooms. The company is also building the Belgian and French pavilions for the world expo in 2020.
These are very busy times for Besix in Dubai. One and a half kilometers from the Atlantis hotel (also built by Besix), the Belgian construction company is currently building a second Royal Atlantis Hotel in futuristic style. It will be huge with almost a hundred swimming pools, more than two hundred apartments and more than seven hundred rooms. It must be ready by the opening of the world expo October 20, 2020.
And so there are buildings that the Belgian company must get finished by next year, because it is also building two pavilions at the expo: the Belgian and the French. "There is nothing upright yet, at most some foundations, but that was planned", reassures Jonas Vandeven. "The entire construction method has been adjusted to that timing. That will be all right. "
In the Belgian pavilion there will also be some concrete structures printed by Besix in 3D, a seat or a pillar from the 3D studio that the company has in Dubai. It is no coincidence that Besix founded that studio in Dubai. Jonas Vandeven explains: "A few years ago, Dubai expressed the vision to become the 'smartest city' of the world. One of the key points was that 25 percent of the buildings would be 3D-printed by 2025. We have not yet got a whole house out of the Besix print robot, the horizontal parts are still too brittle, but vertical structures, pillars and facades and the like are already possible, and we are looking to roll that out. in Belgium. We are seeing interest growing there. We hope to be able to implement our new building solutions in Belgium, "says Vandeven.
In recent years, Besix has built the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque and the Ferrari World amusement park in Abu Dhabi. 140 km away, in Dubai, Besix participated in the construction of the Burj Khalifa (the highest tower in the world, 828 meters, 163 floors), the canal, the metro, Legoland. At the moment, the construction of the Royal Atlantis hotel is in full swing. This project and the Belgian and French pavilions must be finished before the start of the world expo on October 20, 2020. "A very short and intensive period for Besix, but nothing to worry about. That will be all right," says 3D- Director of Besix, Jonas Vandeven.
Tower of one kilometer high
It is therefore a busy construction period for Besix, but also an exciting time. After all, there will soon be an answer to the question whether Besix can build the highest tower in the world, a tower that is said to be one kilometer high. Vandeven: "We are still in the running for that Dubai Creek Harbor project. Officially it is not yet known how big it will be, but in any case it will be the highest in the world. We hope that within a few months it will become clear who is going and then hopefully we can start with that. Our file for that is in. "
Besix was there very early in Dubai and set foot on it in 1965 - that is before the United Arab Emirates came into existence in 1971. In Dubai it has its headquarters, from which it has its 8,000 employees spread throughout the Gulf region , controls. "A third of our turnover is in the Gulf. In the Emirates they see us as a local company. We are part of the" home market "here," explains Jean-Philippe Patesson, technical director of Belhasa Six Construct, the local branch of Besix.
Thursday, October 17, 2019
The Thai language is not difficult at all.
Unlike
English, Thai is beautifully phonetic (it reads like it sounds) and has
a much easier grammar. All the precious time you would normally use
learning a complex grammar is put to good use mastering just 5 tones
(Cantonese has 8), which are more fun than conjugating verbs.
Unlike Chinese, Thai has an alphabet! That alone makes it an easy language.
The
Thai alphabet, though over twice the size of our Roman alphabet, is
very phonetic. In addition to a logical tone system, it even has a
super-helpful little squiggle over certain words (like the one above the
final letter of the Thai word for Sunday, อาทิตย์),
which indicates a silent letter — typically such words are polysyllabic
loans from Sanskrit and therefore more tedious to pronounce, so the
Thai language actually tells you which letter to drop. English, by comparison, is of no help whatsoever in that regard.
When
hone says “Thai has basically no grammar”, one means ‘grammar’ as
understood not by a linguist, but by a layperson.
Thai
has a grammar, yes, but an exceedingly simple one. One can be struck by how simple its grammar is compared to English (not
to mention French which, by the way, many English speakers find
impossibly difficult).
It’s
also true, that Thai’s tonal nature is
the major stumbling block, and not only for European learners. I
noticed that Japanese students often struggled with Thai
tones and vowels far more than Europeans. The Japanese language seems to
have no diphthongs — combinations of two adjacent vowel sounds within
the same syllable (ex. glooay, “banana” in Thai) — which Thai has in abundance. And certain Thai vowels are especially challenging for Japanese learners.
Vowel
length is not an alien concept to English speakers. In English we have
what we call short vowels (the A in “hat”, the O in “hop”) and long
vowels (the A in “hate”, the O in “hope”). Thai vowel length is purely
about length, not about changing the vowel itself, as happens in
English. But no European/English speaker ever had
trouble grasping the concept of Thai vowel length. Their problem was
being able to hear and reproduce proper vowel length combined with tones.
Which is why there is Repetition, Repetition, Repetition.
Just
as an experienced bird-watcher or hunter learns to imitate animal calls
well enough to fool the animals themselves, if you want to learn any
language well enough to be understood by native speakers, you have to
get into the mindset of hitting Replay.
People
may stare at you as you walk down the street in Bangkok repeating
“ah-aaah! oh-oohhh! i-iiih!” under your breath or the “mai mai mai mai
mai” tonal phrase over and over, but that’s what it takes for your brain
to become familiar with new sounds and form new linguistic habits.
Repetition is not difficult.
It
does help if you speak another tonal language like Chinese. But in Thailand, the most well-known Thai-speaking foreigners
(a couple of TV hosts, a couple of singers, etc.) are not Asians but
Westerners.
The
two key ingredients for learning any language are a genuine desire to
learn it, and a parrot-like ability to Replay. Practise until you sound
exactly like what you hear on the street.
Thai is easy. Which is why Thais will always tell you:
Pasaa Thai ngaai-ngaai! (“Thai language easy-easy”)…
Pasaa Ang-grit yaaaak! (“English language haaaard”)
(ource: Quora)
(ource: Quora)
Monday, September 16, 2019
Thursday, August 1, 2019
Malaysian men urgently need to be protected by law
On the 31st of July 2019, Malaysian PKR senator Mohd Imran Abd Hamid proposed to enact a sexual harassment law to “protect” men from being “seduced” into committing crimes such as rape, reported Malaysiakini. :
“I propose a Sexual Harassment Act to protect men from the actions, words and clothing of women, which can cause men to be seduced to the point they can commit acts such as incest, rape, molestation, (watching) pornography and likewise.”Finally, someone understands that the real victims of heterosexual rape are the men.
Malaysia truly Asia.
Tuesday, July 9, 2019
Belgium is a shareholder in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is a multilateral development bank that aims to support the building of infrastructure in the Asia-Pacific region. The bank currently has 70 members as well as 27 prospective members from around the world. The bank started operation after the agreement entered into force on 25 December 2015, after ratifications were received from 10 member states holding a total number of 50% of the initial subscriptions of the Authorized Capital Stock.
The United Nations has addressed the launch of AIIB as having potential for "scaling up financing for sustainable development" and to improve the global economic governance. The starting capital of the bank was $100 billion, equivalent to 2⁄3 of the capital of the Asian Development Bank and about half that of the World Bank.
The bank was proposed by China in 2013 and the initiative was launched at a ceremony in Beijing in October 2014. It received the highest credit ratings from the three biggest rating agencies in the world, and is seen as a potential rival to the World Bank and IMF.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Infrastructure_Investment_Bank)
Text of the treaty in Dutch: https://www.vlaanderen.be/nbwa-news-message-document/document/090135578024059b
Thursday, July 4, 2019
Malaysia: 12-year-old boy arrested in sexual assault case released on bail
in Perak the statistics on child abuse are very high
PETALING JAYA: The 12-year-old boy who was arrested for alleged rape of a four-old girl here has been released on bail.
Batu Gajah district police said the boy was released on Wednesday after bail was posted.
“We are currently investigating the case under the Child Act 2001 together with section 113 Evidence Act,” said Batu Gajah police chief ACP Ahmad Adnan Basri today.
“Due to the boy being 12 years old, we cannot investigate the case under Section 376 of the Penal Code because he is protected under section 113 of the Evidence Act on the presumption that a boy under the age of 13 cannot commit rape.”
He said the police were waiting for a medical report and further instructions from the deputy public prosecutor in Ipoh.
The boy was alleged to have raped the girl who was under the care of his mother, who was a babysitter at a nursery in Batu Gajah.
State exco for Character Development, Women and Family Development and Social Welfare, Wong May Ing, said the state government had launched a guideline book on body safety to be distributed to all students in Perak since the statistics on child abuse in the state are very high.
“It is vital to teach young children about body safety so they can see the differences between the two genders,” she said.
“The parents should be punished when their children under 18 years old commit any wrong doings,” she added.
She also said parents should send their child to registered nurseries and babysitters.
During an anti-domestic violence seminar in Ipoh, Deputy Health Minister Dr Lee Boon Chye said there had been a 60% increase in child abuse cases in Perak between 2015 and 2018.
“The Welfare Department Statistics showed that there were 271 cases in 2015 and 451 in 2018,” Dr Lee said, noting that the majority of these cases involved little girls and were related to sexual abuse and neglect.
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
the UK before Brexit ... already no resources.
A bag in front of my house. Inside are bank cards, make-up but any cash is long gone. A quick look on the security camera – and there are the two female thieves dumping the evidence of their crime. The footage is perfect. I put it on a memory stick. It turns out my local police station is no longer open to the public but there’s one in a neighbouring borough I can go to. The woman on the front desk reluctantly takes the bag but does not want the footage evidence or my name. “It’s terrible but we just don’t have the resources”.
And in London – and most of the UK – it’s true that they don’t. And, of course, when terrorism and violent organised crime is so prevalent, petty thievery is of little consequence. Yet big cities that give up on the everyday policing risk a lot – a return to people leaving the city core in pursuit of safety when they have children or grow old. It also risks dislocating the relationship between police and community.
|
The resources stretch is the same reason, no doubt, that when you walk through Cambridge Circus in the city’s West End you will see kids waiting to see the Harry Potter theatre show – and a crack deal going down. Or why the manager of a central London supermarket tells you that they no longer call the police when they have shoplifters – no point.
Anyone who believes that London’s police have all the resources they need is probably driving in a ministerial car with a nice police escort. They can’t see any shortage. But in London it’s shaping daily life.
|
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Who is the richest king ?
Thailand’s new king among world’s wealthiest monarchs
04 MAY 2019 / 16:57 H.
BANGKOK: Thailand’s King Maha Vajiralongkorn, has been listed as the world’s richest monarch by publications such as Business Insider in 2018.
His father, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, was also listed by Forbes magazine as the world’s richest royal ruler in 2011, edging out the Sultan of Brunei.
Estimates of Vajiralongkorn’s personal wealth start at US$30 billion (RM124 billion), according to Business Insider.
That puts him among the wealthiest individual rulers, although when it comes to royal families, Saudi Arabia’s tops the list with an estimated US$1.7 trillion (RM7 trillion), according an MSN Money report in 2019. The Thai royal family ranked fifth in that list.
Reuters was unable to independently confirm those estimates.
The Crown Property Bureau did not respond to Reuters’ request for comment. The Bureau of the Royal Household did not respond to written questions about the value of royal assets.
The following is a look at some of the Thai king’s most significant assets:
Propery
Most of Vajiralongkorn’s wealth is held in the Crown Property Bureau, which holds title to 6,560ha of land in Thailand, with 40,000 rental contracts nationwide, including 17,000 in the capital.
Vajiralongkorn in 2017 placed the Crown Property Bureau under his direct control and later announced the removal its tax exempt status.
In Bangkok alone, the Crown Property Bureau owns 1,328ha of land, some of it prime real estate in the heart of the business district. Its property holdings in the Thai capital are estimated to be worth US$33 billion (RM137 billion), according to a 2011 biography on Vajiralongkorn’s father, King Bhumibol, A Life’s Work.
The king’s private secretary, Air Chief Marshal Satitpong Sukvimol, was appointed chairman of the Crown Property Bureau in 2017, a position previously held by the Finance Minister.
New property developments
Since the king took control of Crown Property Bureau, some US$4.7 billion (RM19 billion) in new developments have been announced on land it owns, based on company announcements.
Property developers have stepped up investment on Crown Property real estate in recent years with the latest in April, when mall operator Central Pattana Pcl and hotelier Dusit Thani announced the US$1.2 billion (RM5 billion) residential, retail and office project Dusit Central Park on a 67-year lease on 3.68ha. It is expected to be completed in 2024.
In 2018, TCC Group and Fraser Property Ltd, both controlled by billionaire Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi, announced the US$3.5 billion (RM14.5 billion) One Bangkok. The mixed-use project, on 16.7ha with a lease to 2083, is expected to complete its first phase in 2022, according to Fraser Property.
Company stock
In a statement last year, the Crown Property Bureau announced assets previously registered to Crown Property would be held in the King’s name, placing shares worth some US$9 billion (RM37 billion) in companies Siam Cement Group and Siam Commercial Bank among his personal assets.
Vajiralongkorn has a 23% stake in Siam Commercial Bank, Thailand’s second largest lender and 33.3% in country’s largest industrial conglomerate, Siam Cement Group.
Both companies were founded by royal decree in the 1900s.
Siam Commercial Bank and Siam Cement did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.
Gold and gems
Among Thailand’s crown jewels is the 545.67-carat brown Golden Jubilee Diamond, the largest faceted diamond in the world. Its value is estimated at up to US$12 million (RM50 million) by The Diamond Authority, a jewellery website.
It was presented to Vajiralongkorn’s late father, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, in 1996 to mark the 50th year of his reign, according to the Gem and Jewelry Information Center, an industry body in Thailand.
On coronation day, the King will also be presented with five royal instruments, including the 7.3kg golden Great Crown of Victory, which in inlaid with gems and topped by a large diamond from Kolkata, India.
The other priceless regalia are also adorned with diamonds and set in gold enamel, each steeped with history and cultural significance.
Malls
While the Crown Property Bureau’s 17,000 Bangkok rental contracts cover everything from government agencies to shophouses, some of the most visible holdings are the land on which some of the best-known shopping malls are built.
Siam Paragon shopping centre, Siam Discovery and Siam Center, all of which rest on Crown Property land, drew in some 200,000 shoppers per day last year.
The Crown does not run the malls but collects an unknown amount of rent from their operator, Siam Piwat, which also opened the US$1.7 billion (RM7 billion) luxury mall, IconSiam, last year on its own land.
Siam Piwat did not respond to a request for comment. — Reuters
more then 80 % of the production of the fashion industry ends up in a landfill
Sustainability is discussed with increasing urgency in the fashion industry and rightly so: by 2030 some 102m tonnes of clothes will be produced every year but it’s predicted that 81 per cent of these clothes will end up in landfill. That is what makes the Copenhagen Fashion Summit, the key platform on sustainability in fashion, so significant. Will the fashion industry become sustainable?
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Johor Bahru sees drop in crime
JOHOR BAHRU: Crime in Johor Bahru has fallen this year, according to figures announced by Johor police deputy chief Mohd Kamarudin Md Din on Sunday (May 12).
There were 163 fewer cases from Jan 1 to May 7 this year, with 761 recorded compared to the 924 cases over the same period last year - a fall of 17.64 per cent.
READ: Heading to Johor? 5 changes that could affect your travel
This drop in the crime index was made possible by the special crime eradication operation dubbed "Operasi Khas Pemutihan" carried out in the city, said the deputy chief.
He said the operation was aimed at combating various issues to make sure that Johor Bahru was free of social problems, drug addiction, snatch theft and homelessness.
“All district police chiefs have also been directed to carry out the operations in areas vulnerable to crimes and social problems,” he said, adding that it was also to ensure that the state is safe for visitors in conjunction with the Visit Johor Year 2020.
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/jb-johor-bahru-safety-crime-fall-11527312
SJOHOR BAHRU: Crime in Johor Bahru has fallen this year, according to figures announced by Johor police deputy chief Mohd Kamarudin Md Din on Sunday (May 12).
Monday, May 13, 2019
the darkside of Singapore, from a victim's perspective
What is the darkside of Singapore?
The following is a perspective of a young girl, who finds herself victim of the country. Do read, it's interesting. I wish I could publish a true story in the opposite way, but not the hurray hurray publicity of the government.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
am only 17, turning 18 this year, so I might not have as much
experience as others here, but I’ve got lots to share anyway, from the
perspective of a Singaporean youth.
I’m
currently studying in what most Singaporeans may consider a “top
school”, doing the IB program. I’m also from the upper middle class
(with overprotective parents), and thus led a very sheltered life
because I rarely got to mix around with kids from different backgrounds.
However, I recently got admitted into IMH’s psychiatric ward (the child
ward) for suicide attempts and a history of depressive episodes, due to
immense stress from studies among other things and it was an
eye-opening experience, to say the least. So let me share my perspective
as a privileged Singaporean youth suffering from mental illness.
1. The Education System
Singapore’s
education system is often seen as a stellar model that people of other
countries are always trying to learn from. Our students seem to always
do so well, compared to the rest of the world. Apparently, we are the
country with the biggest number of top scorers in the IB program (not
sure about A levels though). But there are alot of problems and ugliness
behind the scenes in Singaporean schools.
I
don’t have exact numbers or statistics, but I can say for a fact that
many Singaporean kids are suffering as a result of the toxic
competitiveness rampant among parents, schools and the entire education
system as well as the pressure to do well for exams. It isn’t uncommon
to find Singaporean students struggling with clinical depression,
anxiety, self harm and suicidal thoughts as a result of stress and
studies, especially in the more elite schools. There are even cases of
students killing themselves over grades (links below). My own brother
(who studied in one of the top JCs) killed himself two years ago, partly
due to the pressure from my parents to do well. During my time in the
ward, I met at least 4 kids from top secondary schools and JCs who
either attempted suicide or seriously self harmed as a result of school
stress. This probably isn’t surprising for many Singaporeans, but most
of these cases rarely reach the media, or even anybody from outside the
schools, because the school management/government bodies are very tight
lipped about things like this. Which leads me to my next point.
2. Treatment of people with mental illness
I
can’t really speak for older people (ie. people of working age and the
elderly), but for youths with mental illnesses, help can be hard to find
and Singaporeans generally aren’t very accepting of people with mental
illnesses. From my personal experience, my parents wouldn’t take me
seriously when I told them I might have depression (they just told me I
was lazy) and it was very hard, as a youth with untreated depression and
no parental support, to find the help I needed. I tried many things:
contacting government organisations, getting myself therapists sessions
with student subsidy (still too expensive to be sustainable), getting
antidepressants from the black market, even attempting to administer CBT
on myself. Only when I got warded did my parents take me seriously.
Also,
mental illness isn’t something Singaporeans are really comfortable
discussing. As mentioned above, many cases I know of kids struggling
with serious mental illnesses and family issues are kept under wraps
because of the stigma. This seriously prevents people from realising how
big of a problem this is in Singaporean schools.
Most
importantly, mental health seems to be a very underfunded and
underdeveloped area in Singapore’s healthcare system. This despite the
fact that the rest of Singapore’s healthcare system is pretty much
stellar. I heard about this from others, but never really understood the
seriousness of the problem until my stay in IMH. The psychiatrists
there seem very overworked, the ward was always filled to near full
capacity (there was only one child ward, and people were being
discharged way before they were ready to make space for others) and the
practices within the ward (ie. physical restraints for even the
slightest aggression) were seriously outdated. This really surprised me
because I have had nothing but good experiences from hospitals for my
physical illnesses from government/non-private hospitals. (was warded in
CGH once for dengue, was going to NUH for years on outpatient because
of thyroid issues)
3. The social/class divide
This
is a serious problem that starts early in life for most Singaporeans.
As a kid from an upper-middle class family in Singapore, I rarely had
the chance to mix around with kids from other backgrounds because of the
way the education system is structured.
Richer
kids go to better kindergartens when they are toddlers, elite primary
schools, then elite secondary schools. Outside of school, the richer
kids would usually have tuition or enrichment classes to occupy their
time, which essentially gears them to score better to get into the elite
schools. The less privileged families cannot afford this kind of
special treatment, especially the extra out-of-school lessons and
therefore, their kids usually don’t do as well academically, which
causes them to go to more average schools. As these kids enter the
workforce, they are discriminated against based on their qualifications,
making it very hard for these less privileged kids to climb the social
ladder. These less privileged kids often get involved with gangs, drugs
and crime in their youth too.
Therefore,
everybody loses. The privileged kids often live a very sheltered
lifestyle, which narrows their worldview and reduces their empathy
towards the less privileged and the less privileged kids miss out on
opportunities to better their situation. This is a very complex problem
to solve.
It is also worth mentioning that a
great number of kids I saw in the child psych ward came from the lower
classes and many were struggling with drugs, self harm and suicidal
thoughts as a result of their circumstances. I learnt a lot from them,
and their multitude of experiences. I never had the chance to meet these
kind of kids in my childhood due to my intensely sheltered upbringing.
—————————
There
are many other problems I can think of, but my answer would go on
forever. These are the most significant at the moment, I feel.
Do comment or message me if you want me to elaborate on anything.
110.2k Views · ·
This is just my opinion so feel free to disagree, but:
Class divide
A
study of this has actually shown that Singapore’s class divide is 7th
in the world, from the bottom. Even as kids the idea of having more
money is better/ boosts your social status in class was very evident for
me. When we entered primary school (7–12 y/o) many of those who stayed
in HDBs (basic apartment flats that are probably subsidised by the
government) looked at those who stayed in landed property with envy.
Singapore is very small, so land is always expensive. Cliques started to
form. Now that I’m in secondary school (kids 13–16 y/o) people tend to
stick with the people of the same class. Can’t imagine how bad it will
be when I’m actually a working adult.
Education
This
leads me on to this point. Singapore’s education system splits up the
good and not-so-good students from as young as 6, since ‘better’ schools
are more likely to have richer kids in there. Within that school, kids
are streamlined from as young as 8 years old. Basically they take your
results and dump you in a ‘good’ class, ‘second’ class, or ‘stupid’
class. It’s very hard to suddenly promote to move up the ‘ranks’ later.
The ‘good class’ students are then split even more into ‘very smart’ and
‘smart’. This promotes the idea of class divide.
Everyone
is very competitive in Singapore. Parents, Teachers and schools, even
though most claim otherwise, put a heavy emphasis on results. I don’t
blame them. Singapore is small, no natural resources, we rely on human
power to build our country. But this causes the students to be extremely
stressed out. I am considered to be in one of the top schools in
Singapore. In primary school I remember getting 89/100 for an English
test. Pretty good, right? I cried my eyes out. That was the first time I
scored anything below a 97. You better bet the next year I was studying
my ass off to be the top in class, which I did manage. That was when I
was 8 to 9 years old. Now, in secondary school, many of us are risking
the chance of failing. In an elite school. Failure is unheard of for us
until now. ‘B’s are not well received either. If all your seniors are
doing just fine, how come you can’t do the same? Some of us try to laugh
it off. Others get depression, anxiety, all kinds of little things.
Many of my friends have been diagnosed. People end up crying in class
during exams period. I myself have witnessed students at the edge of the
building, threatening to jump. They’re the same age as me. Even though I
am not diagnosed with anything as of yet, it’s a tough enviorenment to
be in.
Dealing with depression/ anxiety
I’m
not talking about the way psychologists talk to students, mainly
because I haven’t been to one and have no way of judging. I’m talking
about the adults who seem very unbothered about this. ‘If I went through
the system happily, why can’t you?’ ‘Depression is depression, you suck
it up and move on.’ ‘Depression is just an excuse for things to go
lighter on you.’ ‘I never heard of depression when I was younger. Stop
trying to be the victim.’ ‘Mental illness is fake. It’s all in the mind.
You’re just not doing enough.’ This is what I hear adults telling me.
This is what my family says. Even when parents finally agree to take the
child for counselling or some medical professional, they fail to
emphatise. Having a mental health issue in Singapore, you’re most likely
going to be stigmatised. Students are scared to talk about it. People
are scared that they’ll be judged for it. It’s almost alienating.
Xenophobia
Alright
so Singapore has a lot of immigrants. The last time I checked the stats
it was around 1/3, I think. That’s a lot. You see, I get what people
are saying. They’re diluting our culture, snatching our jobs, creating
traffic jams, causing prices to increase, creating more competition for
everything, blah blah blah. Fair enough. The problem comes when people
channel all the blame to migrants. ‘Oh there’s an accident on the road, I
bet it’s a person from India because they suck at driving. I bet they
didn’t even get their driver’s licence properly.’ Or, ‘stupid person who
cut queue. It’s always the PRCs. Stupid PRCs. All of them are bad.’ I
don’t deny that at least once, I have agreed to those things said above.
Do I like the huge number of immigrants in Singapore? No. Do I enjoy
knowing that these more experienced, smart foreign talents are the
people I will be competing with in the workforce in less than a decade?
Absolutely not. But do I think they are all bad? No. I have friends who
are immigrants. Overseas scholars. Terribly nice people. The problem
only comes when locals decide to lump all the immigrants together and
hate on them.
Racism
Wait, but Singapore doesn’t have many riots! But Singapore is a multi racial country! But we’re living together in harmony!
Yes,
yes we are. That doesn’t mean there’s bad feelings towards the other
races. Singapore is mostly populated with Chinese. I’m a Chinese. Since
young we gave already gathered many stereotypes from our elders towards
other races. Sometimes, when we are angry, we make spite remarks about
their race. Sometimes it’s just a passing comment, like, ‘gosh, so many
Indians, so smelly’. Sometimes it’s a bad day and we just need to bitch,
like ‘oh, look at those Malays always having weddings at the HDB block,
how cheap’. These things add together. It makes us wary of the other
races. And I admit to be prejudiced against the other races. But
sometimes it can be a little much.
B-but we
celebrate Racial Harmony day! Yes, but the school forces us to. Do you
see the adults celebrating? But we give public holidays to everyone for
them to celebrate holidays from other races! Oh, come on, it’s a public
holiday. Who doesn’t love that? Do you think I’ll be outside wishing
everyone ‘happy Hari Raya’, or would I be at home taking a good sleep?
Homophobia
A
significant number of singaporeans are homophobic. There’s law against
gay people, like how gay sex is illegal in Singapore. Gay marriage is,
of course, out of the question. It’s very hard to come out in Singapore.
Many people, escpeially elders, are disgusted by the idea. Many of use
when younger, use ‘gay’ as an insult. I was brought up in such a way
where I didn’t even know being gay was an actual thing, only knowing
about it at around 10. At first I felt very disgusted. 2 guys/girls can
be together? WHAT?!?! when I grew older I tend to understand better,
maybe it’s because I read up more. Teens are half-half about this issue.
I know my whole family is against it. People give funny looks when we
talk about LGBT rights openly. My relatives shut down conversation with
me when I try to bring up LGBT issues to change their rigid mindsets a
little. And I believe I’m not the only one facing such issues in
Singapore.
Expensive/ housing / the expectation to have kids
Everything
is expensive. Cars cost over $100,000, houses cost a lot too. A 3 flat
HDB costs around 200,000, a condominium easily half a million, landed
property easily in the millions, a good class one maybe even up to 30
mil. Road tax, income tax, water and electricity bills, all on the rise.
It’s not expensive to the point where we are poor, but you can imagine.
A fresh graduate isn’t goijg to make that much money. How, exactly, do
you want us to get married? Not only that, but kids cost a lot too.
Having more than 2 is seemingly out of the question.
When
we get married, we need to apply for flats. Most people would go for a
HDB as it’s subsidied a little. It takes 2 years to build a house + all
the documents. You have to be married/ very close to getting married
before you even register. So that’s 2 years of renting/ staying with
your parents. We’re not young when we get married, already maybe 28.
Realistically, kids are probably not going to even be planned until we
get the house, so around 30 y/o. That’s assuming our careers go smoothly
and we have enough money to raise a child.
Singapore
birth rates are low, understandably, perhaps. But the government keeps
trying to change that. There are even posters on the MRTs (trains) to
try and persuade us to have kids. Woman’s fertility goes down after 30.
I’m a girl. If I’m not wrong woman’s fertility is at its prime at 20–24.
We are busy getting a degree! And after that, stressed environments
don’t encourage us to have babies.
That’s also
assuming newer generation couples want kids. I’m turning 16. Most of my
friends at my age don’t want kids either. It’s simply too stressful and
costly to get one. We have other things to worry about. To put it
bluntly, I see it as ruining my body shape and putting myself through
torture for a wailing burden to my pockets that may not even care about
me when I get older.
I’m not sure if these are
the things you are looking for, but yeah. This is purely my opinions and
observations, feel free to disagree. Also there were several comments
against some races/ nationalities etc. I don’t mean to offend anyone and
I apologise if I have upset you in any way.
-----------------------------------------
hereunder are some comments of others
-----------------------------------------
7.8k Views · ·
In
every of any possible bright side of Singapore, you can juxtapose the
dark side. Unfortunately, often it takes a foreigner to apprehend that
quickly as it is hard for one that’s been brought up and assimilated to
the state island to understand what I am going to write. I am a
Malaysian currently living in Singapore for close to 4 years.
Like
most Malaysians, which makes up a dominant part of the Singapore
society today, often we complain about our sister city Singapore when we
compare it to the counterparts of KL, Ipoh, Johor, you name it,
basically the way Malaysia is. You may have your own answers too,
depending where you come from.
There is no
doubt that Singapore is fine (many fines around many societal orders
too), systematic, clean, predictable, cosmopolitan, highly exposed to
international standards and cultures. I would like to highlight, the
sterilization of society and the singularity of culture.
It
is easy to label a cosmopolitan country like Singapore to be
multicultural, or having all the kind of the food of the world in its
island. In reality, if you come from another multicultural country, you
will find this ambiguity a side effect of the sterilized society. You
will know this when you come from other cosmopolitan country that is
geographically larger, which somewhat relaxes up a lot of policies and
encourage creative thinking.
Singapore, being
to the population of more than 5 million today, is relatively poor, or
not exciting when it comes to cultural or societal capital. In a highly
order society that comes with systems that socially engineered the
society choices, it is hard for an individual to breakaway from societal
peer pressure in many ways. The Singapore lifestyle is a highly
mechanized one where society has label certain streams of education
pathways, getting a government flat, getting married, and so on.
However,
there are two sides of the coin to this. On one end, it is the very
uniformity and excellent government systems that ensured societal order
in the pursuit for foreign investment. Take for example, the priority
for English as first English in the late 1990s in order to provide
competent international standard workforce, or, the streamlining of
government flats that form more than 80% of household homes today. These
institutions or solutions are engineered for the very significant
threat of Singapore, e.g housing issue or foreign investment. But then,
it also has caused societies to be very narrow thinking contextually (if
one only lives in Singapore since young), it has also limited the
society’s capability to be resilient and not dependent on Government’s
directive. I can only think that the Singapore story as the best
possible story it can get, it’s a red dot miracle among ASEAN countries
but at times, its national identity is at crisis when you have huge
influx of foreigners. For some, it’s merely a global city that is a
transit point rather than a country system to begin with.
13.3k Views ·
In 2017, ~250,000 Singaporeans chose to migrate out of Singapore. WHY? Lets see.
I’m 20 years old, Male true blue Singaporean. Heres my perspective.
I believe theres always two sides of the story.
National
Service - Sexist discrimination. You rather have a daughter than a son
here. Lag behind in your studies, job disruptions, even death of our
soldiers (recent news).
Highly controlled environment. Media
outlets, political opinions are suppressed, government - controlled
sectors Temasek Holdings, Maritime Port Singapore etc.
Military-political
-industry relationship Being in NS, make me realize how “linked” this
whole network is. There are military personnels CEOs/Chairmans/Head of
politics,hospitals, local companies. It seems theres a certain
“advantage” here from being in the force.
Wealth
shaming/Rich-middle class divide. Don’t be surprised to see 60,70 and
even 80 year olds working as Cleaners, Taxi drivers here. We have one of
the highest income gaps in the world! Recently, there was a leaked
audio by one of a ministers when asked about lowering ministerial
salaries. “ You expect us to only earn 200k/year ? “ This sums it up.
I am looking to emigrate out of Singapore. I love Singapore but this is a country not for me.
2.7k Views ·
Singapore is Not Heaven nor is it Shangri Lai , neither is it Club Met or Disneyland.
It is seductive because someone has a Pretty Face, the inner soul is good.
When comparing to many cities/countries, Singapore has many things in its flavor.
Good Public Transport, Expensive Private Transport ownership.
Good Public Housing, Private Home prices near that of New York/Shanghai.
Good
Public safety, Among the highest per-capita execution rate in the world
(simpler English, crimes that get jail time in other countries,
Singapore just hang the fellow)
Good Public Health
(subjective, voted by many wealthy foreign leaders and expats ) . As
many Quora writers have pointed out, Mental Health is the Hydra that
lurks beneath the surface.
Good Educated Workforce, There are people whom succumb to the stresses (in the education and work environment).
______________________________________________________________________________
It is human nature, to look at something and forget the rest of the package.
Many took Singapore accomplishments for granted.
Look
at the fellow nation, whom started about the same instance as Singapore
did compare them (resource-rich nation) with Singapore today.
______________________________________________________________________________
Keep your face to the sunshine and you cannot see a shadow. Turn around, the shadow looms before you.
666 Views ·
Racial
/ religious undercurrents, although Singapore has by and large, been
more successful than many other countries in creating a tolerant
society. Away from the academic discussions, many in the other ethnic
group still think the Chinese are never bathe, are rediculously
money-faced / Malays are lazy slackers, stupid and unable to do well in
math and the sciences (a friend said his mum forbade him from playing
with Malay kids beneath the apartment block when he was a child, as she
believed all Malays are a bad influence)/ Indians are smelly, cannot be
trusted because they are the best twisters of truths (among others).
Such thoughts still perpetuate today among one's own ethnicity, which
isn't surprising, of course. Every now and then these undercurrents do
flare up, such as the curry incident or when a staff member complained
about the noise created at Malay weddings. Its a messy mix of heritage,
economics and politics but thankfully, most Singaporeans do not take the
occasional slip of the tongue too seriously.
Riding
on a fellow Quoran's answer about gangs in Singapore, i was fortunate
enough to attend a talk by the ‘Gangs unit’ of the Criminal
Investigations Department several years ago. Apparently the underworld
is still very much alive and these undercover officers (thanks to them
risking their lives, we can walk safely on the streets at night) do
monitor and intervene with gang activity. It was quite an eye-opener for
me, because i would think in this age where people are caught up with
technology, getting relatively good living standards, nobody goes hungry
in Singapore, who would bother with silly skirmishes over things like
“why u stare at me??!! Want to fight issit??”. But yes, fights still do
occur and one of the photos shown (undoctored) at the talk was a gang
leader who had been stabbed many times and hand sliced neatly off, lying
in a drain at a hdb estate.
1k Views ·
Opening speech of AG Tommy Thomas at trial of Najib Razak
May it please Your Lordship,
It
is my duty and privilege to open the first trial in our courts against a
former Prime Minister, who for nearly a decade, occupied the most
powerful office in the land and wielded near absolute power, which
carries with it enormous responsibility, which my office intends to
discharge in order to establish that the Accused is guilty of the seven
(7) charges that he is facing before Your Lordship.
The
Accused during his entire period in office as Prime Minister, at which
time these offences were committed, simultaneously held the office of
Minister of Finance, thereby combining maximum political power and
control of the nation’s purse. In holding the office of the Prime
Minister, and thus the nation’s highest elected public officer and Head
of Government, the highest trust was reposed by our people in the
Accused. In such circumstances, the law demands the highest standards of
care in the discharge by the Accused of his duties and obligations as
trustee of public offices.
Not being
satisfied with the holding of the twin positions of Prime Minister and
Minister of Finance, the Accused was also appointed the Chairman of the
Board of Advisors of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (“1MDB”) and Advisor
Emeritus in its fully owned subsidiary, SRC International Sdn. Bhd.
(“SRC International”). A common feature of both companies was that the
true power in directing and managing their affairs did not lie with the
Board of Directors, as is required by law and is the universal practice
wherever companies carry on business, but in the person of the Accused
by virtue of his holding these two positions.
The
operation of Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution that “all persons
are equal before the law” is amply demonstrated by this trial. A former
Prime Minister is charged under due process in the ordinary court of
the land, like any other Accused. The Accused is not above the law and
his prosecution and this trial should serve as precedents for all future
holders of this august office.
My Lord,
This
trial is the first of many kleptocracy-1MDB-linked prosecutions. As
required under Section 179 of the Criminal Procedure Code, I will state
briefly the nature of the offences charged and the evidence by which the
Prosecution proposes to prove the guilt of the Accused.
In the instant prosecution, the Accused is charged for the following offences –
1. One (1) charge under Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 for abuse of position;
2. Three (3) charges under Section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust;
3.
Three (3) charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering,
Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001
for money laundering; and
To prove
the prosecution case beyond a reasonable doubt, the Prosecution will be
relying on direct and circumstantial evidence, both oral and
documentary, to prove that the Accused, on the dates, times and manner
as contained in the charges, is guilty of each of the charges against
him.
One (1) charge under Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 for abuse of position
For
the charge under Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009, evidence will
establish that the Accused at all material times, as an officer of a
public body, to wit, as Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, used his
office and/or position to obtain for himself a gratification of RM42
million. Evidence will abundantly establish that the Accused was
directly involved in the decision on behalf of the government of
Malaysia to give government guarantees for the loans amounting to RM4
billion received by SRC International Sdn Bhd from Kumpulan Wang
Persaraan (Diperbadankan) (“KWAP”).
In
proving the ingredients of Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009, evidence –
oral, documentary and/or circumstantial, will be led by the prosecution
to establish the following –
> Proposed establishment of SRC International Sdn Bhd;
> Proposed setting-up grant of RM3 billion;
> SRC International’s request for a government loan for RM3.95 billion;
>
The appointment of SRC International’s Board of Directors, and the
appointment of one Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil as CEO of SRC International;
>
Matters that led to the approval of the Government of Malaysia through
the Ministry of Finance for the issuance of a RM2 billion government
guarantee in favour of SRC International;
>
Matters that led to the approval of the Government of Malaysia through
the Ministry of Finance for the issuance of a further RM2 billion
government guarantee in favour of SRC International;
>
Monies totalling RM42 million, sourced from SRC International, were
channelled through the company accounts of Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd (a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SRC International Sdn Bhd) and Ihsan Perdana
Sdn Bhd (purportedly appointed as SRC International’s corporate social
responsibility partner);
> The
Accused, between 17 August 2011 and 8 February 2012, as a result of the
aforesaid, had received as gratification the said monies totalling RM42
million into his AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 and
AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 bank accounts.
Three (3) charges under Section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust
For
the charges under Section 409 of the Penal Code, evidence will
establish that the Accused at all material times, as agent, to wit, as
Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, and Advisor Emeritus of SRC
International, whilst entrusted with monies belonging to SRC
International, committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the RM27
million, RM5 million and RM10 million belonging to SRC International.
In
proving the ingredients of Section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal
breach of trust, evidence – oral, documentary and/or circumstantial,
will be led by the prosecution to establish the following –
>
A Special Resolution was passed to amend SRC International’s Articles
of Association to appoint the Accused as Advisor Emeritus. As Advisor
Emeritus the Accused shall advise the Company’s Board on material
matters and matters of strategic interest to Malaysia, and that the
Board shall give due consideration to and implement any advice of the
Advisor Emeritus in the best interest of the Company;
>
That the Accused had dishonestly caused himself to wrongfully gain RM42
million and/or caused SRC International to wrongfully lose RM42
million;
> That between 24 and 29
December 2014, a sum of RM27 million belonging to SRC International was
remitted to the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0
account through the company accounts of Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd and
Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd;
> That
between 24 and 29 December 2014, a sum of RM5 million belonging to SRC
International was remitted to the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-MY no.
211-202-201190-6 account through the company accounts of Gandingan
Mentari Sdn Bhd and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd; and
>
That between 10 February and 2 March 2015, a sum of RM10 million
belonging to SRC International was remitted to the Accused’s AmPrivate
Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account through the company accounts of
Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd.
Three
(3) charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering,
Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001
for money laundering
For the
charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering,
Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001
for money laundering, evidence – oral, documentary and/or
circumstantial, will be led by the prosecution to establish the
following –
> That the Accused on
or about 26 December 2014 engaged in money laundering to wit by
receiving RM27 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, in
the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account;
>
That the Accused on or about 29 December 2014 via a Real Time
Electronic Transfer of Funds and Securities (“RENTAS”) instruction,
remitted RM27 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, from
the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account to the
company account of Permai Binraya Sdn Bhd;
>
That the Accused on or about 26 December 2014 engaged in money
laundering to wit by receiving RM5 million, being the proceeds of an
unlawful activity, in the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-MY no.
211-202-201190-6 account;
> That
the Accused on or about 29 December 2014 via a Real Time Electronic
Transfer of Funds and Securities (“RENTAS”) instruction, remitted RM5
million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, from the Accused’s
AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account to the company account
of Putra Perdana Construction Sdn Bhd;
>
That the Accused on or about 10 February 2015 engaged in money
laundering to wit by receiving RM10 million, being the proceeds of an
unlawful activity, in the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no.
211-202-201188-0 account;
> That
the Accused on or about 10 February 2015 remitted RM10 million, being
the proceeds of an unlawful activity, from the Accused’s AmPrivate
Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account to the Accused’s AmPrivate
Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account;
>
That the Accused had issued a total of 15 personal cheques from his
AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account totalling an
approximate sum of RM10,776,514.00;
>
Evidence will also establish that in December 2014, the Accused’s
credit card was charged US$130,625 for expenses made at Chanel, an
exclusive fashion store in Honolulu; and
>
Evidence will establish that the personal cheques were issued for,
among others, payment for renovation works carried out at the Accused’s
residence at No.11 Jalan Langgak Duta, Kuala Lumpur, the Accused’s
residence in Pekan, Pahang and cheques issued to various Barisan
Nasional component political parties.
My Lord,
The
burden is now on the Prosecution to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that the Accused, Mohd. Najib bin Hj Abd Razak is guilty of the criminal
charges preferred against him at this trial.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)